Cold-evoked potentials in clinical practice: A head-to-head contrast with laser-evoked responses.

BACKGROUND: Innocuous cooling of the skin activates cold-specific Aδ fibres, and hence, the recording of cold-evoked potentials (CEPs) may improve the objective assessment of human thermo-nociceptive function. While the feasibility of CEP recordings in healthy humans has been reported, their reliability and diagnostic use in clinical conditions have not been documented. METHODS: Here, we report the results of CEP recordings in 60 consecutive patients with suspected neuropathic pain, compared with laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) which are the gold standard for thermo-algesic instrumental assessment. RESULTS: CEP recording was a well-tolerated procedure, with only ~15 min of surplus in exam duration. The reproducibility and signal-to-noise ratio of CEPs were lower than those of LEPs, in particular for distal lower limbs (LLs). While laser responses were interpretable in all patients, CEPs interpretation was inconclusive in 5/60 because of artefacts or lack of response on the unaffected side. Both techniques yielded concordant results in 73% of the patients. In 12 patients, CEPs yielded abnormal values while LEPs remained within normal limits; 3 of these patients had clinical symptoms limited to cold sensations, including cold-heat transformation. CONCLUSIONS: CEPs appear as a useful technique for exploring pain/temperature systems. Advantages are low cost of equipment and innocuity. Disadvantages are low signal-to-noise ratio for LL stimulation, and sensitivity to fatigue/habituation. Joint recording of CEPs and LEPs can increase the sensitivity of neurophysiological techniques to thin fibre- spinothalamic lesions, in particular, when abnormalities of cold perception predominate. SIGNIFICANCE: Recording of cold-evoked potentials is a well-tolerated, inexpensive and easy-to-use procedure that can be helpful in the diagnosis of abnormalities in the thin fibre- spinothalamic pathways. Supplementing LEPs with CEPs allows consolidating the diagnosis and, for some patients suffering from symptoms limited only to cold, CEPs but not LEPs may allow the diagnosis of thin fibre pathology. Optimal CEP recording conditions are important to overcome the low signal-to-noise ratio and habituation phenomena, which are less favourable than with LEPs.

Defect of the Endogenous Inhibitory Pain System in Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome: A Laser Evoked Potentials Study.

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a complex sensorimotor disorder. Symptoms worsen toward evening and at rest and are temporarily relieved by movement. Symptoms are perceived as painful in up to 45% of cases, and nociception system may be involved. OBJECTIVES: To assess the descending diffuse noxious inhibitory control in RLS patients. METHODS: Twenty-one RLS patients and twenty age and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) underwent a conditioned pain modulation protocol. Cutaneous heat stimuli were delivered via laser evoked potentials (LEPs) on the dorsum of the right hand (UL) and foot (LL). N2 and P2 latencies, N2/P2 amplitude and pain ratings (NRS) were recorded before (baseline), during, and after a heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation (HNCS) application. The baseline/HNCS ratio was calculated for both UL and LL. RESULTS: N2 and P2 latencies did not vary between groups at each condition and limbs. Both groups showed a physiological N2/P2 amplitude and NRS reduction during the HNCS condition in UL and LL in comparison to baseline and post conditions (all, P < 0.003). Between-groups comparisons revealed a significant lower amplitude reduction in RLS at the N2/P2 amplitude during the HNCS condition only for LL (RLS, 13.6 µV; HC, 10.1 µV; P = 0.004). Such result was confirmed by the significant difference at the ratio (RLS, 69%, HC, 52.5%; P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The lower physiological reduction during the HNCS condition at LL in RLS patients suggests a defect in the endogenous inhibitory pain system. Further studies should clarify the causal link of this finding, also investigating the circadian modulation of this paradigm. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Amygdala and anterior insula control the passage from nociception to pain.

Activation of the spinothalamic system does not always result in a subjective pain perception. While the cerebral network processing nociception is relatively well known, the one underlying its transition to conscious pain remains poorly described. We used intracranial electroencephalography in epileptic patients to investigate whether the amplitudes and functional connectivity of posterior and anterior insulae (PI and AI) and amygdala differ according to the subjective reports to laser stimuli delivered at a constant intensity set at nociceptive threshold. Despite the constant intensity of stimuli, all patients reported variable subjective perceptions from one stimulus to the other. Responses in the sensory PI remained stable throughout the experiment, hence reflecting accurately the stability of the stimulus. In contrast, both AI and amygdala responses showed significant enhancements associated with painful relative to nonpainful reports, in a time window corresponding to the conscious integration of the stimulus. Functional connectivity in the gamma band between these two regions increased significantly, both before and after stimuli perceived as painful. While the PI appears to transmit faithfully the actual stimulus intensity received via the spinothalamic tract, the AI and the amygdala appear to play a major role in the transformation of nociceptive signals into a painful perception.

High-speed heating of the skin using a contact thermode elicits brain responses comparable to CO2 laser-evoked potentials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare nociceptive event-related brain potentials elicited by a high-speed contact-thermode vs an infrared CO2 laser stimulator. METHODS: Contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) and CO2 laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were recorded in healthy volunteers using a high-speed contact-thermode (>200 °C/s) and a temperature-controlled CO2 laser. In separate experiments, stimuli were matched in terms of target surface temperature (55 °C) and intensity of perception. A finite-element model of skin heat transfer was used to explain observed differences. RESULTS: For 55 °C stimuli, CHEPs were reduced in amplitude and delayed in latency as compared to LEPs. For perceptually matched stimuli (CHEPs: 62 °C; LEPs: 55 °C), amplitudes were similar, but CHEPs latencies remained delayed. These differences could be explained by skin thermal inertia producing differences in the heating profile of contact vs radiant heat at the dermo-epidermal junction. CONCLUSIONS: Provided that steep heating ramps are used, and that target temperature is matched at the dermo-epidermal junction, contact and radiant laser heat stimulation elicit responses of similar magnitude. CHEPs are delayed compared to LEPs. SIGNIFICANCE: CHEPs could be used as an alternative to LEPs for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain. Dedicated normative values must be used to account for differences in skin thermal transfer.

Supraspinal facilitation to repetitive painful stimulation: a laser-evoked potential study.

To better characterize central modulation mechanisms involved in the processing of daily repetitive painful stimulation, laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were recorded at and away from the conditioning area in healthy participants. In addition, we aimed to evaluate a repetitive painful stimulation paradigm that could be conducted in a shorter time frame than previous studies. Collectively, continuous pain rating, warm and heat pain threshold results suggest that sensitivity to pain was reduced 24 h after the shortened repeated painful stimulation. Laser-evoked potentials revealed a significant increase in the contralateral arm to where the conditioning stimulus was applied. This finding was specific to noxious conditioning (i.e., not seen in the control brush experiment). These results provide neurophysiological evidence of pain facilitation resulting from prolonged exposure to painful heat, potentially arising in supraspinal structures.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We provide evidence for supraspinal faciliation measured via laser-evoked potentails in response to a shortened and methodologically improved repetitive painful stimulation paradigm, serving the broader scientific community, insofar as providing a paradigm can feasibly be completed in a caldendar week. These findings provide new evidence using laser-evoked potentials indicating increased activation of the anterior cingulate cortex during prolonged pain processing.

Unravelling the role of unmyelinated nerve fibres in trigeminal neuralgia with concomitant continuous pain.

OBJECTIVE: In this clinical and neurophysiological study, we aimed to test trigeminal nerve fibre function in patients with trigeminal neuralgia, with and without concomitant continuous pain. METHODS: We enrolled 65 patients with a definite diagnosis of primary trigeminal neuralgia. Patients were grouped according to whether they experienced purely paroxysmal pain (36) or also had concomitant continuous pain (29). All participants underwent trigeminal reflex testing to assess the function of large non-nociceptive myelinated fibres and laser-evoked potentials to assess the function of small myelinated Aδ and unmyelinated C fibres. Neurophysiological examiners were blinded to the affected side. RESULTS: The only neurophysiological abnormality distinguishing the two groups of patients was the side asymmetry of C fibre-related laser-evoked potential amplitude (p = 0.005), which was higher in patients with concomitant continuous pain than in patients with purely paroxysmal pain (indicative of a reduced C fibre-related laser-evoked potential amplitude in the affected side of patients with concomitant continuous pain). CONCLUSIONS: Our clinical and neurophysiological study indicates that in patients with trigeminal neuralgia concomitant continuous pain is associated with unmyelinated C fibre damage as assessed with laser-evoked potentials. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that concomitant continuous pain is related to unmyelinated C fibre loss, possibly triggering abnormal activity in denervated trigeminal second-order neurons.

Neuropathic pain in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: A clinical and laser-evoked potential study.

BACKGROUND: Pain, either nociceptive or neuropathic (NP), is a common symptom in Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. METHODS: We investigated small fibers involvement and its correlation with pain in different CMT subtypes through a systematic clinical and neurophysiological study. We enrolled 50 patients: 19 with duplication of PMP22 (CMT1A), 11 with mutation of MPZ (CMT1B, CMT2I/J, or CMTDID), 12 with mutation of GJB1 (CMTX1), and 8 with mutation of MFN2 (CMT2A and CMT2A2B). Pain was rated with the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale and characterized through Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory. Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were recorded after right foot and hand stimulation and N2-P2 complex amplitude and latency were compared with those of 41 controls. RESULTS: Overall pain prevalence was 36%. NP was present in 14.6% of patients, with a length-dependent distribution in 85.7% of cases, and it was significantly more frequent in CMT1A (p < 0.001). Aδ fibers involvement greatly varies between CMT subtypes, reflecting differences in molecular pathology and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Prolonged N2 latency from foot stimulation was noted in 11 CMT1A patients, 5 of which report NP. MPZ-CMTs displayed different neurophysiological phenotypes and a very low prevalence of NP. LEPs were normal in all but one CMTX1 patients, although lower limbs N2-P2 amplitude was significantly reduced in males (p = 0.043). MFN2-CMTs were NP free and LEPs recordings were all normal. NP strictly correlated with LEPs alterations (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: NP prevalence varies among CMTs subtypes and is mainly related to Aδ fibers impairment. SIGNIFICANCE: Neuropathic pain is a frequent finding in Charcot-Marie Tooth disease and is related to Aδ fibers impairment. Patients at higher risk are those belonging to certain genetic subtypes (i.e. CMT1A and CMT2J) or with laser-evoked potentials abnormalities. While managing this disease, clinicians should be aware of this symptom in order to offer best treatment options to their patients.

Laser evoked potentials in fibromyalgia with peripheral small fiber involvement.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate multichannel laser evoked potentials (LEPs) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and small fiber impairment. METHODS: We recorded LEPs using 65 electrodes in 22 patients with FM and proximal denervation, 18 with normal skin biopsy, and 7 with proximal and distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) reduction. We considered the amplitude and topographical distribution of N1, N2 and P2 components, and habituation of N2 and P2 waves. The sLORETA dipolar analysis was also applied. We evaluated 15 healthy subjects as controls. RESULTS: We observed reduced amplitude of the P2 component in FM group, without a topographic correspondence with the prevalent site of denervation. Decreased habituation of P2 prevailed in patients with reduced IENFD. The cingulate cortex and prefrontal cortex, were activated in the FM group, without correlation between the degree of denervation and the strength of late wave dipoles. A correlation was noted between anxiety, depression, fibromyalgia invalidity, and pain diffusion. CONCLUSIONS: The amplitude and topography of LEPs were not coherent with epidermal nerve fiber density loss. They supposedly reflected the clinical expression of pain and psychopathological factors. SIGNIFICANCE: Multichannel LEPs are not the expression of small fiber impairment in FM. Rather, they reflect the complexity of the disease.

Laser-evoked potentials recover gradually when using dorsal root ganglion stimulation, and this influences nociceptive pathways in neuropathic pain patients.

OBJECTIVE: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is able to relieve chronic neuropathic pain. There seems evidence that DRGS might achieve this by gradually influencing pain pathways. We used laser-evoked potentials (LEP) to verify our hypothesis that the recovery of the LEP may reflect DRGS-induced changes within the nociceptive system. METHODS: Nine patients (mean age 56.8 years, range 36-77 years, two females) diagnosed with chronic neuropathic pain in the knee or groin were enrolled in the study. We measured each patient's LEP at the painful limb and contralateral control limb on the first, fourth, and seventh day after implantation of the DRGS system. We used the numeric rating scale (NRS) for the simultaneous pain assessment. RESULTS: The LEP amplitude of the N2-P2 complex showed a significant increase on day 7 when compared to day 1 (Z = -2.666, p = 0.008) and to day 4 (Z = -2.547, p = 0.011), respectively. There was no significant difference in the N2-P2 complex amplitude between ON and OFF states during DRGS. The patients' NRS significantly decreased after 1 day (p = 0.007), 4 days (p = 0.007), and 7 days (p = 0.007) when compared to the baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that with DRGS, the LEP recovered gradually within 7 days in neuropathic pain patients. Therefore, reduction of the NRS in patients with chronic neuropathic pain might be due to DRGS-induced processes within the nociceptive system. These processes might indicate neuroplasticity mediated recovery of the LEP.

Effects of spatial attention and limb position on the cortical interaction of bilateral noxious inputs.

Bilateral noxious inputs interact in the brain to provide a better representation of physical threat. In the present study, we investigated the effects of spatial attention and limb position on this interaction. Painful laser stimuli were applied randomly on the right hand or on both hands, while varying spatial attention (focal or overall) and limb position (hands near or far from each other). Pain perception and laser-evoked potentials (N1, N2, P2) were compared between conditions in 27 healthy volunteers. Compared with unilateral stimulation, bilateral stimulation increased pain (p = .004), the N2 (p = .0015) and P2 (p < .001) amplitude. The effects on pain and the P2 were greater when hands were in the near compared with the far position (p < .05). The effect on pain was also greater for overall compared with focal pain rating (p = .003). In addition, the N1 amplitude was greater for bilateral stimulation when hands were in the far compared with the near position (p = .01). These results show that increased brain responses and pain for bilateral compared with unilateral noxious stimulation are modulated differentially by spatial attention and limb position. This suggests that the integration of noxious inputs occurs through partially independent pain-related processes, that it is modulated by limb position, and that it is partially independent of pain perception. We propose that this is necessary to produce coordinated, flexible and adapted defensive responses.

Cortical interaction of bilateral inputs is similar for noxious and innocuous stimuli but leads to different perceptual effects.

The cerebral integration of somatosensory inputs from multiple sources is essential to produce adapted behaviors. Previous studies suggest that bilateral somatosensory inputs interact differently depending on stimulus characteristics, including their noxious nature. The aim of this study was to clarify how bilateral inputs evoked by noxious laser stimuli, noxious shocks, and innocuous shocks interact in terms of perception and brain responses. The experiment comprised two conditions (right-hand stimulation and concurrent stimulation of both hands) in which painful laser stimuli, painful shocks and non-painful shocks were delivered. Perception, somatosensory-evoked potentials (P45, N100, P260), laser-evoked potentials (N1, N2 and P2) and event-related spectral perturbations (delta to gamma oscillation power) were compared between conditions and stimulus modalities. The amplitude of negative vertex potentials (N2 or N100) and the power of delta/theta oscillations were increased in the bilateral compared with unilateral condition, regardless of the stimulus type (P < 0.01). However, gamma oscillation power increased for painful and non-painful shocks (P < 0.01), but not for painful laser stimuli (P = 0.08). Despite the similarities in terms of brain activity, bilateral inputs interacted differently for painful stimuli, for which perception remained unchanged, and non-painful stimuli, for which perception increased. This may reflect a ceiling effect for the attentional capture by noxious stimuli and warrants further investigations to examine the regulation of such interactions by bottom-up and top-down processes.

Revealing the time course of laser-evoked potential habituation by high temporal resolution analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Reduced laser-evoked potential (LEP) habituation indicates abnormal central pain processing. But the paradigm (four stimulation blocks a 25 stimuli) is time consuming and potentially omits important information on the exact habituation time course. This study examined whether a high temporal resolution (HTR) analysis (dividing the four stimulation blocks into 12 analysis blocks) can answer the following questions: (a) After how many stimuli does LEP habituation occur? (b) Is there a difference in LEP habituation in younger versus older subjects? (c) Is HTR applicable on radiculopathy patients? METHODS: EEG data of 129 subjects were included. Thirty-four young healthy and 28 advanced-aged healthy subjects were tested with LEPs on the hand dorsum. Thirty-seven radiculopathy patients and 30 controls were tested with LEPs on the L3 dermatome. The EEG data of the hand dorsa have been analysed conventionally and with HTR analysis. The applicability of HTR has been tested on radiculopathy patients and respective controls. RESULTS: HTR was well feasible in young healthy subjects and revealed a strong habituation effect during the first 25 stimuli (i.e. within the first 5 min). After approximately 48 stimuli, no further significant habituation was detectable. LEP amplitudes were higher in young subjects. HTR was unsuitable for elderly subjects and middle-aged radiculopathy patients. CONCLUSIONS: In young healthy subjects, HTR allows a shortening of the test protocol while providing a detailed information on the time course of LEP habituation. A shorter protocol might be useful for the applicability of the LEP paradigm for clinical and experimental settings as well as pharmacological studies. SIGNIFICANCE: The usage of high temporal resolution (HTR) analysis in young healthy subjects enables a short test protocol and provides the exact time course of laser-evoked potential habituation. This can be useful for the examination of neurological conditions affecting younger patients and for pharmacological studies. HTR was inapplicable in advanced-aged subjects and patients with radiculopathy.

Neurophysiologic assessment of small fibre damage in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), demonstration of small fibre (SF) damage is important to understand chronic late effects. METHODS: Thirty patients having complaints compatible with possible CIPN following treatment with oxaliplatin or docetaxel were compared with 27 healthy subjects. All subjects were evaluated with quantitative sensory testing (QST) assessing SF function and laser evoked potentials (LEP). In addition, SF-damage was assessed using cutaneous silent periods evoked with electrical (El-CSP) and laser (Ls-CSP) stimuli. RESULTS: For LEP, N2P2 amplitudes were significantly smaller in patients than controls in both upper (P = 0.007) and lower extremities (P = 0.002), and the N1 amplitude in upper extremities of patients were significantly smaller than in controls (P = 0.001). SF-QST, LEP, Ls-CSP, and El-CSP were abnormal in 10 (33.3%), 16 (53.3%), 19 (63.3%), and 24 (80%) of CIPN patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with possible CIPN, El-CSP and Ls-CSP were more often abnormal than LEP and QST. This is probably because El-CSP and Ls-CSP inform mainly about peripheral nociceptive fibres, while LEP and QST inform about peripheral and central nociceptive pathways together. SIGNIFICANCE: LEP and QST are established methods to detect SF-damage. El- and Ls-CSP might help clinicians in diagnosing SF-damage.

Inhibition of cortical somatosensory processing during and after low frequency peripheral nerve stimulation in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Transcutaneous low-frequency stimulation (LFS) elicits long-term depression-like effects on human pain perception. However, the neural mechanisms underlying LFS are poorly understood. We investigated cortical activation changes occurring during LFS and if changes were associated with reduced nociceptive processing and increased amplitude of spontaneous cortical oscillations post-treatment. METHODS: LFS was applied to the radial nerve of 25 healthy volunteers over two sessions using active (1 Hz) or sham (0.02 Hz) frequencies. Changes in resting electroencephalography (EEG) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) were investigated before and after LFS. Somatosensory-evoked potentials were recorded during LFS and source analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Ipsilateral midcingulate and operculo-insular cortex source activity declined linearly during LFS. Active LFS was associated with attenuated long-latency LEP amplitude in ipsilateral frontocentral electrodes and increased resting alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (16-24 Hz) band power in electrodes overlying operculo-insular, sensorimotor and frontal cortical regions. Reduced ipsilateral operculo-insular cortex source activity during LFS correlated with a smaller post-treatment alpha-band power increase. CONCLUSIONS: LFS attenuated somatosensory processing both during and after stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: Results further our understanding of the attenuation of somatosensory processing both during and after LFS.

Sexism-Related Stigma Affects Pain Perception.

People with stigmatized characteristics tend to be devalued by others in a given society. The negative experiences related to stigma cause individuals to struggle as they would if they were in physical pain and bring various negative outcomes in the way that physical pain does. However, it is unclear whether stigma related to one's identity would affect their perception of physical pain. To address this issue, using sexism-related paradigms, we found that females had reduced pain threshold/tolerance in the Cold Pressor Test (Experiment 1) and an increased rating for nociceptive laser stimuli with fixed intensity (Experiment 2). Additionally, we observed that there was a larger laser-evoked N1, an early laser-evoked P2, and a larger magnitude of low-frequency component in laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) in the stigma condition than in the control condition (Experiment 3). Our study provides behavioral and electrophysiological evidence that sexism-related stigma affects the pain perception of females.

Posterior insular activity contributes to the late laser-evoked potential component in EEG recordings.

OBJECTIVE: Nociceptive activity in some brain areas has concordantly been reported in EEG source models, such as the anterior/mid-cingulate cortex and the parasylvian area. Whereas the posterior insula has been constantly reported to be active in intracortical and fMRI studies, non-invasive EEG and MEG recordings mostly failed to detect activity in this region. This study aimed to determine an appropriate inverse modeling approach in EEG recordings to model posterior insular activity, assuming the late LEP (laser evoked potential) time window to yield a better separation from other ongoing cortical activity. METHODS: In 12 healthy volunteers, nociceptive stimuli of three intensities were applied. LEP were recorded using 32-channel EEG recordings. Source analysis was performed in specific time windows defined in the grand-average dataset. Two distinct dipole-pairs located close to the operculo-insular area were compared. RESULTS: Our results show that posterior insular activity yields a substantial contribution to the latest part (positive component) of the LEP. CONCLUSIONS: Even though the initial insular activity onset is in the early LEP time window,modelingthe insular activity in the late LEP time window might result in better separation from other ongoing cortical activity. SIGNIFICANCE: Modeling the late LEP activity might enable to distinguish posterior insular activity.

Multimodal sensory evaluation of neuropathic spinal cord injury pain: an experimental study.

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the changes in somatosensory functions using the combined application of quantitative sensory testing (QST), contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) and laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) studies in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in relation to neuropathic pain (NeP). SETTING: Centre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland. METHODS: Individuals with SCI were compared: 12 with NeP (SCI NeP) and 12 without NeP (SCI no NeP). Tools used were QST, CHEPs, LEPs and self-reported questionnaires. Tests were applied to the control (hand) and test (dermatome of altered sensation) sites, and compared to the able-bodied group. RESULTS: QST, LEPs and CHEPs assessments showed abnormalities both on the test and control sites, which did not differ between the groups with SCI. QST showed higher prevalence of allodynia in SCI NeP. CHEPs and LEPs demonstrated diminished amplitudes in both groups with SCI in comparison to able-bodied individuals. Only reaction time (RT) analysis revealed the difference of SCI NeP from the other two groups, expressed in partially preserved responses to the laser C-fibre stimulations. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of assessments in our study allowed to examine spinothalamic and dorsal column functions in individuals with SCI. Changes in QST, CHEPs and LEPs were detected below the level of injury independent of NeP and at the control site indicating modifications in sensory processing rostral to the spinal lesion. Analysis of RT during laser stimulation could be an essential component when evaluating the somatosensory functions related to NeP in persons with SCI.

Laser-Evoked Potentials to Pudendal Stimulation in Healthy Subjects: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: Laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) are useful neurophysiological tools for investigating the A-delta sensory peripheral fibers and the central nociceptive pathway. The current investigation aims to obtain normative values of LEPs via pudendal nerve stimulation in healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: Laser-evoked potentials were recorded in 16 men and 22 women, 22 to 75 years of age, using neodymium and yttrium and aluminum and perovskite laser bilateral stimulation to the pudendal nerve-supplied skin and the dorsal surface of the hands and feet. We assessed the perceptive threshold, latency, and amplitude of the N1 component and main vertex N2-P2 complex. The relationship between gender, age, height, and site of stimulation was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Both in men and in women, laser perceptive threshold increased from genitalia to foot and from hand to foot (P ≤ 0.001). N1 and N2-P2 latencies progressively increased from pudendal area to hand to foot (P ≤ 0.008). N1 and N2-P2 complex LEP amplitudes progressively decreased from hand to genitalia to foot (P ≤ 0.04). The latencies of N1 component and N2-P2 complex of LEPs correlated with body height, whereas the amplitude of the N2-P2 complex correlated negatively with age; no correlations were observed between the latencies and amplitudes with gender. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative data on pudendal LEPs versus hand and foot LEPs. Incorporation of pudendal LEPs into clinical practice could provide a valuable neurophysiological tool for the study of pelvic pain syndromes.